Google Webmaster Central Blog - Official news on crawling and indexing sites for the Google index

Dealing with low-quality backlinks

Friday, October 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Webmaster level: Intermediate/Advanced

Webmasters who check their incoming links in Webmaster Tools often ask us what they can do when they see low-quality links. Understandably, many site owners are trying to build a good reputation for their sites, and some believe that having poor-quality incoming links can be perceived as "being part of a bad neighbourhood," which over time might harm their site's ranking.

example of low-quality links
If your site receives links that look similarly dodgy, don't be alarmed... read on!

While it's true that linking is a significant factor in Google's ranking algorithms, it's just one of many. I know we say it a lot, but having something that people want to look at or use—unique, engaging content, or useful tools and services—is also a huge factor. Other factors can include how a site is structured, whether the words of a user's query appear in the title, how close the words are on the page, and so on. The point is, if you happen to see some low quality sites linking to you, it's important to keep in mind that linking is just one aspect among many of how Google judges your site. If you have a well-structured and regularly maintained site with original, high-quality content, those are the sorts of things that users will see and appreciate.

That having said, in an ideal world you could have your cake and eat it too (or rather, you could have a high-quality site and high-quality backlinks). You may also be concerned about users' perception of your site if they come across it via a batch of spammy links. If the number of poor-quality links is manageable, and/or if it looks easy to opt-out or get those links removed from the site that's linking to you, it may be worth it to try to contact the site(s) and ask them to remove their links. Remember that this isn't something that Google can do for you; we index content that we find online, but we don't control that content or who's linking to you.

If you run into some uncooperative site owners, however, don't fret for too long. Instead, focus on things that are under your control. Generally, you as a webmaster don't have much control over things like who links to your site. You do, however, have control over many other factors that influence indexing and ranking. Organize your content; do a mini-usability study with family or friends. Ask for a site review in your favorite webmaster forums. Use a website testing tool to figure out what gets you the most readers, or the biggest sales. Take inspiration from your favorite sites, or your competitors—what do they do well? What makes you want to keep coming back to their sites, or share them with your friends? What can you learn from them? Time spent on any of these activities is likely to have a larger impact on your site's overall performance than time spent trying to hunt down and remove every last questionable backlink.

Finally, keep in mind that low-quality links rarely stand the test of time, and may disappear from our link graph relatively quickly. They may even already be being discounted by our algorithms. If you want to make sure Google knows about these links and is valuing them appropriately, feel free to bring them to our attention using either our spam report or our paid links report.

The comments you read here belong only to the person who posted them. We do, however, reserve the right to remove off-topic comments.

43 comments:

kalanosh said...

No clue where to leave so blog of webmaster sounds perfect. Under Code of Conduct on the investor page ". But it's also about doing the right thing more generally -- following he law, acting honorably and treating each other with respect. " its following "the law" not "he law" just small misspelling.

http://investor.google.com/conduct.html

your welcome... peace

san said...

Seems a bit harsh if site owners were to be penalised for incoming links from spammy sites. Unfortunately, it's not something that as a site owner I have any control over. Sure you can ask them to remove the links, but are they likely to do that given they're not really a reputable site in the first place?

DataPlus - Custom Data Services said...

Really we don't have control over everyone linking to our site but in reality we hope it isn't so much to make a difference.

danny said...

Actually, there is a simple way fro google to handle the poor-quality links and fight the link spam.

Just allow webmasters to "reject" some links in their google.com/webmasters panel. Make a checkbox near each link and allow webmaster to "refuse" any number of links.

That also solves the problem of punishing websites for purchasing massive amounts of links in black SEO schemes. Currently, Google cannot punish such sites because that would make it easy to dump a competitor by buying a 100,000 tnx.net links for him at $0.001 each. But when a webmaster can reject such links in his panel (or, alternatively, accept only legal links, or reject links from certain type of websites - think of the filters), he bears full responsibility for black SEO links and can be punished for them.

Jarvey said...

You can block your site from spammy links if you have access to your .htaccess file. Once they notice the link doesn't work hopefully they will remove it.
Example:

RewriteEngine on
## Options +FollowSymlinks
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} site1\.com [NC,OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} site2\.com [NC,OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} lastsiteinlist\.com
RewriteRule .* - [F]

Sheldon (Marketing Consultant, Tauranga, NZ) said...

I fail to see the harm in a low quality back-link. Do you think a prospective customer will frown upon you if they see a link to your website on a spammy directory? What are they doing in that spammy directory in the first place? There are certainly other places more cost efficient when it comes to Search Engine Optimisation where we should direct out attention.

Google has got it right: "focus on your content".

Charles said...

Great info here. Whenever I need tips to make my blogger blogs better, I always come here. Thanks a bunch.

Kerry Degman said...

Hi ! Google webmaster tool said that my site has tons of duplicate content pages. It seems that Google see these links as duplicate content :
abc.com/xyz
abc.com/xyz/
I searched and found ot that because some other blogs linked to my site and the links pointed to abc.com/xyz instead of abc.com/xyz/
So how do I fix this problem since I'm using a free service which doesn't allow me to use 301 redirect method and I can't tell other bloggers like this "Hey, thanks for your links. You killed my site. Please remove the links."

Jan Dunlop said...

Ask them to remove links, yeh right!

Recently a site that I work with had over 400,000 spammy automated links pointed at it within a period of a few weeks which was a real concern but has not effected the site in any way.

I'm sure if it was a smaller less authoritative site, it would have caused some issues.

@danny - Interesting idea, banning links from your webmaster account.

Felix said...

I agree with what Danny said above. that would be the best way to fight the problem.

Glen said...

Danny - not every website has a Webmaster Tools account. In fact I'd say it's only a small proportion of sites that do. So what you propose would still punish those sites that are 100% reputable yet aren't savvy enough to block spammy incoming links. It's a good idea but an imperfect solution.

John said...

Funny that this post should pop-up now, there is a great article about the impact of low quality links posted a few days ago in response to Ms Ohye's video interview.

read the post and watch the video here; http://bit.ly/1U6Czm

Matt N said...

I do not know why Google make things so complicated. I mean no disrespect to Google or its services. However the constant fight against spammers, the never ending rumors of how Google works, and the very poor support (referring to the webmaster help 'FORUM') is sad and pathetic.

Personally it should not matter at all who links to whom on the internet. IT IS THE INTERNET. Something that no one should have control over. It is almost as if Google goes out of their way to make things complicated. We should not have to go out of our way to ask people to remove our links. Google should think more of their users instead of their algorithm.

Google doesn't even follow their own 'Philosophy' anymore. I love Google, but I am losing respect for it everyday they make us go out of our way to fit their guidelines.

SEO BRO said...

Typical black hat strategy is to create an aura of spammy for your web site by having "bad neighbors" link to you.

office said...

@danny - You would be shooting spurrows with canons and you would do a lot more damage than good.

If I was a large company, then allocating man power to fiddling with your 'feature' would make very little difference. However, your 'feature' would have a huge negative impact on me an and other small outfits.

It will add to my costs without improving the prices or services I provide if I have to pay somebody to do the extra administration. The only alternative would be to do it myself, which would be on time re-allocated from the time I spend on making my clients happy. Both ways, a loose-loose situation.

gruvr said...

what are you supposed to do if you know about high-quality links to your site which do not show up in Google Webmaster tools?

Michael Martinez said...

This is the second time in a couple of weeks that Google has come out and said, "Hey! Links are really not that important to our ranking algorithms!"

If history is any guide, it will take the SEO community about 2-20 years to catch on to your message and to both accept and support it.

I hope you have that kind of staying power on this issue.

منتدى اسكندرانى said...

I'm sure if it was a smaller less authoritative site, it would have caused some issues.

Gloria said...

Google says it's not the only factor. However, it seems to be the only factor for Brands' sites ranking for highly competitive keyword, that have no SE Friendly structure. (I see many of them in flash with no content)

Devaki Phatak said...

Agree with @danny.

Been working with a site that attracts spammy automated links and it would be good to have some control over it.

Jessica said...

Informative. Thanks.

Jessica,
Sample Resume

fiftyseven said...

I dont know if I want to manually sift through 100,000 links in google webmasters and weed out what is spam and what is not.

That should be google's responsibility, not mine.

Risma2006 said...

Hi Google Webmaster Tools Team
As I told this before that I have found one thing in Google that in my opinion its strange. On top search queries that webmaster tools informs one of my article has rank 7 on Google.co.id SERP. But when I try to search manually on google.co.id, the search result has position 25. What is wrong with it. The keyword is Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa with url http://risma2006.blogspot.com/2009/09/mengembalikan-jati-diri-bangsa.html

Alejandro Angelico said...

Wow, a good example of saying "nothing" with a lot of words!!!

BenweB said...

I really like danny's idea that seems very simple and effective and at first glance error free.

I am curious what would be wrong with that?

Poyandeh said...

par ne faire qu’une. C’est dans l’amour que fusionner prend son sens.
Pour trouver l’amour, le premier pas doit se faire sur la base d’un amour puissant,sur lui-même, pour que le chemin ouvre ses bras d’un amour uni et égal.

Tevfik said...

I think Google should punish sites that allow spam to be done. In addition, this site should not be taken into consideration from the output link.

justinwheeler said...

Hmm, I suspect that most web masters have more to worry about than dodgy backlinks.

Im not sure how a site would get said backlinks anyway but assuming they didnt go out to get them themselves, it would be bizaare if google allowed them to negatively affect a companies ranking otherwise we could all go off and kill our competitors!

Danny's suggestion of using webmaster tools is impractical, if you have over say 20 websites linking to you. I have enough to do with monitoring comments and creating fresh new content, without checking thousands of links.

Tejas said...

I think that links should not have negative value. Maybe difficult to incorporate in the search algorithm.

However, I take the advice that one shouldn't worry about spammy links, giving that they have limited influence on the search rankings

David said...

To me this is just another post with Google basically saying:

1. Others densing spammy links to you may harm your site.

2. Good luck asking them to remove them.

--

And also the blog post talks about many other things but we already knew that making a good site is good for rankings. What we are concerned about is the fact that competitors can hurt your site with spammy links, and this post basically confirms that.

vishal said...

its very good to know, google continue improving the search results and telling webmasters to how to improve the websites quality. its very hard to pick the bad links and removed our links from them... although we can try our best to filter the bad links and only work with good same theme links... we can not stop competitors to do bad work for our site, but we can track those links and report the google. webmaster tool is now showing more n more information about the website internal links, outlinks, meta details ect..and we can use google optimizer to know more about our website.

Google always love good high quality content rich websites those providing true information to user so everybody should try to make their website in same manner if you need good ranking on search results... :)

vishal
internetimm.com

S said...

Ok, so are you saying that since google doesn't value backlinking that much, as a new website I don't need to worry about getting back links?

Thanks
Ruby Miller
www.herentrepreneur.com

hotnoob said...

Having a high google pr really doesnt do much. If you compare some of my olds sites. one has a pr of 4, and gets 20 visits a day, another has a pr of 1 and gets 50 thousand clicks a day.

High quality back links are not worth it, however, having links on sites with high amounts of traffic are better. - a low traffic link may bring one user every week or month, where as a high traffic link can bring anywhere from 5 to a couple thousand users a day.

---
http://pewpewbangbang.isgreat.org

Alun said...

I may be missing the point, but I don't
see how reporting a link to your own
site as a paid link is going to do any
good - as well as suggesting that the "bad" site sells links, it suggests that
you buy them.

If its a paid link, maybe the easiest
way to get rid of it is to stop paying for it.

Web Design Site said...

but if they are obscene Links?

Personalfn said...

I just checked links to my website, and I was surprised that some one has put thousands of links for my website, in last 1 month.
I checked through Google's webmaster tool, all these thousands of links are spam links, with spam words as anchor text.
My website niche is finance, and some one has put links to my inner webpages , with spam words like viagra or phentramine, that also in thousands of numbers, by doing blog commenting.

I am really worried, what to do?
How can I delete those links from those blogs or websites.
All these blogs and websites are seems to be dead, that is i don't think that the moderator is active, as thousands of spam comments has been put on those website..

charbelboughosn said...

Hi,

My problem is that in the webmaster tools I can see external links to my website. But when I google site:example.com no links are retrieved. any idea on this issue?

iphone4 said...

Is there plans to redesign the webmaster tools?

sampleletters said...

Short and simple, but very informative..Hope you shared this with SEO community on face book!

crisplicker said...

I have magically just received 5008 links to my website of which none appear to be in Google search results.
Visiting the urls there is no mention of my website.
So it appears they have cloaked the content for Google.
What I find strange is that a major competitor is actually listed on the site for real.

How can I report them as spam if they are not appearing in the search results?

As others have mentioned, would love to be able to reject the links.

g2webhost said...

Great info here. thank you

Παπιγκο said...

China again Fuck google!

Google Webmaster Central said...

Hi everyone,

Since over a year has passed since we published this post, we're closing the comments to help us focus on the work ahead. If you still have a question or comment you'd like to discuss, free to visit and/or post your topic in our Webmaster Central Help Forum.

Thanks and take care,
The Webmaster Central Team