Tuesday, December 18, 2007 at 6:40 AM
As a webmaster, you may have been concerned about your RSS/Atom feeds crowding out their associated HTML pages in Google's search results. By serving feeds, we could cause a poor user experience:
- Feeds increase the likelihood that users see duplicate search results.
- Users clicking on a feed may miss valuable content available only in the HTML page.
As a user, you may ask yourself whether Google has a way to search for feeds. The answer is yes; both Google Reader and iGoogle allow searching for feeds to subscribe to.
We're aware that there are a few non-podcast feeds out there with no associated HTML pages, and thus removing these feeds for now from the search results might be less than ideal. We remain open to other feedback on how to improve the handling of feeds, and especially welcome your comments and questions in the Crawling, Indexing and Ranking subtopic of our Webmaster Help Group.
For the German version of this post, go to "Wir entfernen Feeds aus unseren Suchergebnissen."


13 comments:
"Users clicking on a feed may miss valuable content available only in the HTML page." But let's not forget advertising: having the feed often means not having to visit the site, which is where the advertising usually is.
@ghosty: Not quite. If you use FeedBurner, you can have advertising in your feed as well. Blogger and FeedBurner have worked our a very nice and easy way to "burn" your Blogger feed at FeedBurner and automatically forward all feed subscribers to the new feed URI.
Ideally, it would be nice to have the ability to opt in/out from search engine crawling for all feeds, not just podcasts. But I can see how that would be too much for some people, and understand why feeds are normally excluded from the search results.
Gmail also support feeds.
...
Don't know why you guys added that feature really...
Thanks guys!
When you are going to separate Blog postings from the regular search results?
Jen
While you're not going to show the content of feeds in actual search results, will Google's bots still consume and use feeds as a referral point to index their corresponding HTML content? In other words, are feeds still an effective way to push content to search engine indexes (i.e for SEO)?
thank you sir
So if you have a website that has both unique content and a rss feed on the same page, will the entire page be deindexed by google?
Feeds should be handled by having them shown next to the actual correct page for them.
If I have a page with a rel=alternate link in it that points to a feed, then it would be super if Google:
a) Showed that page instead of the feed
b) Showed a link next to it (maybe using a feed icon) that linked to its feed.
People could subscribe to feeds directly from the google search results.
XML feeds don't link. Why beleive they have an SEO value ?
If you can place such a cheap document an XML feed can be on SERP#1, then it means the query is quite easy to occupy, and you should be able rank the real page #1 to #5 on SERP#1 with no effort.
Feeds are made for users, not for search engines.
Moreover, blocking feeds indexing with a robots.txt file will prevent you from duplicating your content, making it more valuable.
In a way, indexed feeds smell like spam...
Can we add GA code in .info sites??????
Re, the point that some feeds may want to be indexed. Sitemaps to me look like the almost perfect 'optin' method for this. If the feed is in the sitemap.xml index it, otherwise dont!
hi! i have problem with my blog, http://apolthegreat.blogspot.com
it used to be indexed at google,but right now, a search for "site:apolthegreat.blogspot.com" would return feeds from my blog, but not my blog url.
i also notice a drop from my search engine traffic.
how do i correct this?
your reply will appreaciated.
thanks.
It has been 4 month since this google announcement but the problem is still not resolved.
try to search 'taurus china shenhua' in google
http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=en&q=+taurus+china+shenhua++&btnG=Google+Search&meta=&aq=f
you will see my feed instead of the relevant page on my site.
The China Story - 2 visits - 5:31amChina Shenhua (1088.HK) J.P. Morgan Chase & Co 10% Merrill Lynch & Co 7% Alliance Berstein 6% Taurus Investment SA 5%. Conclusion ...
www.thechinastory.org/feeds/posts/default - 70k - Cached - Similar pages
What is going on?
Post a Comment